How to critique a photograph (Blog #31)

Welcome to my latest blog, which this week is my thoughts (and a bit of anxiety) about my upcoming Open University photography course, 'Digital Photography: creating and sharing better images', one of the main components of which is critiquing fellow students' photography and, by way of fairness, having your own photography critiqued in return, or to 'receive valuable peer feedback' as it states in the course material. The course is a creative mix of practice, learning, sharing and reflection.

In essence this blog is about how to approach critiquing a photograph.

I have been posting my photography on various social media platforms for a number of years. Fortunately my work has drawn a miniscule number of negative comments, which no matter how well intentioned, always cut to the quick. To have my work critiqued in a formal, academic setting, will be  something new for me, and will probably be the most daunting part of the course. The flip side of this is that I will be expected to contribute some comments of my own about the work of others, which is also a bit scary. I don't want to upset anyone, do I?

I don't want to randomly throw comments out there, veering from one line of thought to another; my critique has to be structured in such a way that it covers every aspect of what I see before me, is in some way structured, and at least gives the impression that I know what I am talking about.

What does 'Critiquing a photograph' involve? In very broad terms it means evaluating various elements such as composition, lighting, subject matter, and technical aspects. I have put together this structured approach, one I will be adopting during my course, and which is intended as general advice for you. 

The first thing I will evaluate is the composition, trying to assess how the elements within the frame are arranged. I will be looking for balance, symmetry, leading lines, and the rule of thirds, although being prepared for the latter being broken or not wholly adhered to. 

Next it is handy to evaluate the quality and direction of light. Consider if it enhances the subject, creates shadows, or affects mood. Natural light vs. artificial light can also be compared. Light is what photography (from the Greek meaning writing with light) is all about so you should always include at least a couple of sentences in your critique.

What is the subject of the photograph? Is it obvious? Is it engaging? A photograph, as with any other piece or work of art, should evoke emotion and tell a story. Does the image you are looking at do these two things?

Has the photographer got the basic technical elements right, such as focus, exposure, sharpness, and color balance. Assess if these aspects are appropriate for the intended effect.

Creativity is an important aspect in photography. Look for originality and creativity in how the photographer has captured the scene. Consider if there are unique perspectives, angles, or post-processing techniques used.

Consider how the photograph makes you feel. Does it stir any emotions, good or bad or leave a lasting impression? Does it tell a story?

Do you know or understand the context in which the photograph was taken? Interpretation of the image depends on cultural, social, or historical elements. 

Last, but by no means least, provide constructive criticism by highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. It is good practice to open your critique with positive comments before moving on to any negative ones you may have. Stick to  specific suggestions for how the photographer could enhance their work. Remember to be respectful and considerate when providing critique, as it's an opportunity for growth and learning for the photographer.

Finally, here's one of my photographs from a recent trip to Sacramento. I invite you to critique it.

I hope to see you for my next blog. In the meantime you can follow me on all of my social media platforms as listed above 

© Mike Young 2024.